Skip to content

Interactive product slice

Weight what matters in your clinic and rank veterinary PMS options in real time.

Adjust workflow weights, mark the issues your team is trying to fix, and review a decision summary with migration watch-outs.

Clinic priorities

Weight your evaluation criteria

What are you trying to fix?

Ranked vendors

1

ezyVet

Cloud-heavy operations depth for growing and higher-complexity clinics.

Guided migration support

Weighted fit

357.2

Strongest matches

  • Internal handoffs
  • Workflow speed

Watch-outs

  • Evaluate training load if your team is coming from a simpler desktop workflow.
  • Check whether the configuration depth will slow adoption for smaller teams.
2

Pulse

Lighter, modern-feeling workflow option for clinics chasing simplicity.

Light-to-moderate migration support

Weighted fit

301.2

Strongest matches

  • Workflow speed
  • Internal handoffs

Watch-outs

  • Confirm reporting depth against owner and manager expectations.
  • Validate edge-case workflows before assuming the lighter experience covers everything.
3

Cornerstone

Broad adoption and operational familiarity with mixed modernization tradeoffs.

Moderate migration support

Weighted fit

270.4

Strongest matches

  • Migration readiness
  • Internal handoffs

Watch-outs

  • Map treatment-floor clicks carefully during demos.
  • Check how much work your team will still do outside the core workflow.
4

DVMAX

Operationally stable for some practices, but worth pressure-testing against modern workflow needs.

Moderate migration support

Weighted fit

239.1

Strongest matches

  • Internal handoffs
  • Migration readiness

Watch-outs

  • Check whether mobile and shared-team workflows still require workarounds.
  • Look closely at handoff friction if your clinic is already juggling too many steps.
5

Avimark

Familiar legacy option for clinics optimizing around established habits.

Moderate migration support

Weighted fit

226.7

Strongest matches

  • Migration readiness
  • Internal handoffs

Watch-outs

  • Pressure-test repeated-entry pain if your team already feels slowed down.
  • Review remote and multi-location expectations carefully before committing.

Decision summary

ezyVet leads for cleaner team handoffs, reduced repeat entry.

ezyVet currently ranks ahead of Pulse because it better matches the weighted workflow priorities in this scorecard. Use this as a structured discussion starter, then pressure-test the top two vendors against live demo scenarios from your clinic.

Migration watch-outs

  • Evaluate training load if your team is coming from a simpler desktop workflow.
  • Request a demo flow that mirrors intake, treatment, billing, and end-of-day follow-up for one real appointment type.
  • Document what data migration, training, and cutover support is included before comparing price alone.

Recommended next steps

  • Carry ezyVet and Pulse into the next demo round with the same workflow script.
  • Assign one owner to record every workaround, extra click, and missing handoff during demos.
  • Build a migration checklist that includes data cleanup, team training windows, and rollback questions.

Included vendors

ezyVet

Strong cloud workflows and deeper operational tooling, especially for clinics that expect to grow or coordinate across more moving parts.

Avimark

Common incumbent with familiarity value, but often the baseline clinics are trying to improve on when workflows feel dated.

Cornerstone

Still widely considered, especially by teams that want a known name, but clinics should pressure-test modernization and workflow-fit assumptions.

Pulse

Useful for clinics that want a cleaner operational surface and less process drag, especially if they value staff usability.

DVMAX

A legacy consideration for clinics that prioritize familiarity, though many buyers will need to compare it directly against workflow and migration goals.

Cookie consent

VetStack Fit uses optional analytics cookies to understand traffic, scorecard engagement, and CTA performance. You can accept or decline.